Vybe Realty, LLC

Edit Content

Navigate

Contact

RIP – The 6% Commission Model, Maybe!

The 6% real estate commission has been a de facto standard in the residential real estate industry, and a highly effective model for selling homes. This model was predicated on a clear division of labor between the listing agent, who focused on marketing the property, and the buyer’s agent, who specialized in sales. This segmentation not only clarified the roles and responsibilities of each agent but also maximized the efficiency and effectiveness of the home-selling process. 

Why this division  led to a successful model in real estate transactions.

MARKETING

  • The Domain of the Listing Agent: The listing agent’s primary responsibility was marketing the property. This involved a suite of strategic activities designed to showcase the home to the widest possible audience. These activities included:
  • Professional Photography and Staging: Creating a visually appealing presentation of the home to capture the interest of potential buyers.
  • Listing on the MLS: Ensuring the property details are accessible to all real estate agents with buyers in the market.
  • Digital Marketing and Open Houses: Leveraging online platforms and hosting events to attract a broad audience.This marketing push was aimed at generating awareness and interest, and creating a large pool of potential buyers. 

The listing agent’s expertise was in understanding market trends and crafting compelling property listings was crucial in setting the stage for successful sales negotiations.

SALES

The Buyer’s Agent’s Arena Once the marketing efforts have attracted potential buyers, the buyer’s agent would take the lead. Their role was pivotal in converting interest into action. This involves:

  • Guiding Buyer Decisions: Helping buyers understand the value of the property and envisioning themselves living there.
  • Negotiation: Working to get the best possible terms for the buyer, which, in turn, facilitates the sale.
  • Closing the Deal: Navigating the complexities of the sales process to ensure a smooth transition to closing.

The buyer’s agent was focused on sales, employing their negotiation skills and market knowledge to align the desires and expectations of the buyer with the realities of the market and the specifics of the property.

Why This Model Worked

This division of labor between marketing and sales harnessed the specialized skills of each agent, leading to a more efficient and effective process. 

Here’s why it was successful:

  • Efficiency: By concentrating on their respective areas, agents worked more effectively, leveraging their specific skills and knowledge.
  • Wider Reach and Better Matches: The listing agent’s marketing efforts ensured that the property reached a broad audience, while the buyer’s agent helped to filter this interest into serious, well-matched prospects.
  • Enhanced Negotiation Dynamics: Having separate agents for the buyer and seller avoided conflicts of interest and ensured that both parties had professional representation advocating for their best interests.

Here’s why it failed:

It failed because of a lack of transparency in the sales process but mostly because of the misconception that the seller paid the buyer’s agent commission.  Looking back, the economic dynamics of the transaction suggested that the buyer was the one who ultimately paid both commissions. Here’s why:

The purchase price of a home was determined by what the buyer was willing to pay and the seller was willing to accept. So when sellers listed a home, they typically had a net amount in mind that they wanted to pocket after all fees and commissions were paid. This expectation was baked into the listing price. Therefore, when a buyer agreed to purchase a home at a given price, they were not only covering the cost of the property itself but also the embedded real estate commissions. The funds for the commissions came from the total amount paid for the house, which the buyer brought to the table. In essence, the buyer’s payment funded the entire transaction structure, including the agents’ commissions.

Conclusion

The 6% commission model was not just about compensating agents; it was about relying on a proven process that efficiently and effectively brought buyers and sellers together. It consisted of the reach of the MLS, and a clear delineation between marketing (listing agent) and sales (buyer’s agent) which allowed for a streamlined process that maximized the likelihood of a successful sale. This model benefited all parties involved by leveraging the specific talents and expertise of each agent, ensuring that homes were not just listed, but sold, and often more quickly and at better prices. This strategic division of labor underscores the value of professional representation in real estate transactions, which made the 6% commission a wise investment for sellers aiming for the best possible outcome in their home sale.